| |
| 
|
|
The Unnatural Practice of Leg Shaving
by LUCY. Wednesday, June 21, 2006
|
|
| |
|
With the first stroke of the razor, I regretted it, but I had to keep
going. It was the first time that I had shaved my legs in months and I was
starting to wish that I had just left them alone. Clumps of blonde hair came
off with every stroke of the razor and I felt like I was maiming myself. My
leg hair had become a part of me and now I was slowly removing it, stroke by
stroke. When I was done, I had the profound feeling that I had made a
stupid decision. My legs were extremely smooth, but it did not seem natural.
First I felt like a child, but afterwards I decided the feeling was more
extraterrestrial than childlike. I can't believe I used to do this a few
times a week, I thought to myself. Indeed this is a question I have
wondered about for a while now: Why do so many women do this to
themselves?
I first became aware of the practice of leg shaving when I was in sixth
grade. All of a sudden everybody was doing it and if you weren't you were
nobody. So, of course, I needed a razor and some shaving cream to make myself
cool. Unfortunately for me, my godmother with whom I was living at the time
had different plans for my leg hair. She told me that I was too young to
start shaving my legs and that I would only regret it later, because my hair
was so fine and light and it would only grow back darker. These words only
made me roll my eyes. Why would I regret it? To me it seemed like a lifelong
commitment that everyone made. Well, that all women made anyway. It was just
the normal thing to do.
I decided that I needed to shave my legs, and never mind that the hair on
them was barely visible. When I was on vacation with a friend I tried it for
the first time. She had a junky, little disposable razor that she let me
borrow. Of course I didn't know what I was doing and I sliced into my leg
pretty badly. I still have the scar, a little healed gash that the razor
bumped over during every subsequent shave, to remind me of the first.
I didn't stop there, though. I had to keep doing it. I bought a razor at
my dad's house without my godmother knowing and proceeded to use it whenever
I visited my dad. I wasn't very good at it and I would cut myself often, but
I had to keep shaving my legs. Eventually my godmother caved in and I
began to shave my legs all the time. I loved the smooth, silky soft feeling
of my shaved legs and didn't mind the fact that they were often spotted with
cuts.
I bought a better razor, improved my shaving technique and continued to
remove the little bits of blonde hair that kept poking through my skin. As I
matured, I saw the strangeness in this unnatural practice and I thought about
quitting, but it was hard. Every time I would stop shaving, my legs would
get all itchy and prickly and, after a week, I would invariably start again.
I convinced myself that I really liked the smoothness of my shaved legs and
that that was why I couldn't stop. It wasn't that I couldn't, it was just
that I didn't want to stop, I told myself. Finally I decided I needed to stop
to see if I really would rather keep shaving. Once my legs got past the
itchy stage, I realized that my leg hair was very nice. It became silky and
soft. When I walked down the street in shorts or a skirt, the wind riffled
through the hair on my legs producing a nice sensation. I never had to worry
about shaving, but my legs were always soft and nice. They were never prickly
or itchy because of my gross leg stubble. And that was when I became
hooked on the natural state of my legs.
That I say I was hooked on it may seem strange, but in our society it is
considered strange for a woman's legs to be in their natural state. In truth,
when I became hooked on the natural state of my legs it was more comparable
to becoming hooked on breathing oxygen or having a nose, but that is not the
generally held belief. This is because women are expected to shave their
legs. Period. That's just how it is. Sure you can choose not to shave your
legs, but then you must also risk social ridicule. The hair on my legs is
barely visible, but I often wonder when I'm wearing a skirt if people on the
bus notice it and what they are thinking about it. Women's leg hair is always
a question. Even if a woman chooses not to shave her legs, she is faced
with a whole new set of choices such whether to cover the hairy legs. Men are
not expected to shave their legs, but they are also expected not to wear
revealing clothing, especially clothing which shows much of their legs. Even
if women were to scale one superficial barrier, they would simply run into it
again in another form: People in the United States find body hair
unsightly and gross and it is to be hidden or removed. As hip women's clothes
get smaller and smaller, more and more body hair has to go. As adults, there
are really some places where body hair should remain intact, but even those
places are not sacred in the practice of body hair removal, which can become
an obsession.
The answer to this question boils down to, but is not limited to: women
should be hairless and show it off, men should be hairy and hide their
hairiness. The real question here is: why? No, more importantly, why can't we
change this? Both women and men should be able to choose whatever they want
to do and this includes body hair preferences and clothing choices. Women
should not be ridiculed for having hairy legs, but men should not be
ridiculed for shaving their legs either. So, next time a man makes an
unsavory comment about your hairy legs tell him that you fully support his
right to shave his legs and that maybe he should try it sometime.
|
|
|
| |
 |
| |
| |
 |
|
| |
| |
|
"I don't agree with this.firstly keeping hair in its "natural" state is slovenly,and only for hippies and other people who don't shower daily.I
love the silky feel of my legs and have since I was nine years old.For the record when legs have stubble,it is time to shave them,which shouldn't be a problem for those of us who make it a point
to shower daily.Natural things can,in some instances,be as good as non natural things,but in the instances of sun exposure,hair color,child birth,pubic hair removal,and our legs it is not.It is for those idealistic hippies who have yet to realize woodstock was over long ago.As for men,most of the ones I know manscape,not just the under thirty set,my father who is nearly fifty shaves his legs.Maybe there different kinds of women,My kind the beautiful,attractive,well groomed,hygenic,smart,caring,modern
women,who get mystic tans istead of baking in the sun because its important for us not to become old hags,who always were sunscreen,who use Clinique,and vist the derm regularly,and have an account saved up so when we get older we can get Botox,Restylane,titan,we have personal trainers,are college educated,come from middle class are higher,loving intact families,who are moral,and do volunteer work,who
went to private school,who have good relationships with our parents,wonderful friends,and a good love life,we take birth control and only have kids if we choose to,which we very well may not,I won't.If we do have children
you can guarantee we will get an epidural,we are strong and feminine
we are driven and a little demanding.We get brazilion waxing.
There are the normal girls who fall somewhere in between,and there are the slovenly hippies,the dated angst filled people who have long since left there teenage years behind,the are "laidback"careless
unhygenic,lazy,vegan,mother earth worshiping,outcast who lets face it don't care to even pretend to be normal,they love natural,not good things,not normal,non forward things that is just consider a waist of time by us functioning members of normal soicty,those those difficult and disapointing children,who believe the sun is there friend,and child birth should be natural two things people of this centery do not.this articale leads me too question the author's belief system and what part of soicity she comes from.
-Respectfully Jessica"
Jessica |
Wed, Jun. 18, 2008 @ 09:00 AM
|
|
| |
| |
|
"jessica, your comment makes me wonder why you, as a "functioning member of normal society", don't have a grasp on spelling or grammar.
as for this article by lucy, I think it's very thoughtfully laid out discussing the points of view. not with judgment, but more in exploration around what society's pressures are around hair/hairlessness. plus, her writing is very good... which always makes a point of view more enjoyable to read."
robin |
Thu, Jun. 26, 2008 @ 11:53 AM
|
|
| |
| |
|
"dudes this issue is WAY big.... (allow me to disclaim my spelling skills before gitting [kidding] into it) I have to admit three things:
1. I totally give my girlfriend a hard time about putting on fake eyelashes.
2. I give here a hard time about altering her eyebrows.
3. I don't care if she shaves or waxes, but I'm not down with hairy legs on the significant other. Stubble is too scratchy and the idea longer leg hair (which would be dark against her skin) makes me have what I understand to be an unreasonable reaction of... {I totally hate to say this} disgust.
So yeah, there it is. I happen to be a heterosexual male and hairless legs (who knows why) bespeak femininity.... there is something disgusting about that too.
Props to those who are busting up the boundaries around what is and ain't feminine! Ultimately you are displaying true vision and guts... moving us all in the right direction one less stupid beauty product purchase at a time. Consider the ills (and twisted joys) of the high heeled shoe....
check out the storyofstuff.com
Peace"
nat |
Thu, Jun. 26, 2008 @ 12:41 PM
|
|
| |
| |
|
"wow, nat, that storyofstuff.com site is POWERFUL! I have been feeling the effects of watching that on Thursday for days now... thank you so much."
willo |
website |
Tue, Jul. 1, 2008 @ 09:45 AM
|
|
| |
| |
 |
| |
 |
|
| |
|
We encourage intelligent and mature feedback. Thank you!
|
|
| |
|
|
|